but we have to go deeply into the question of what BEFORE means if time started with the big bang. I think the answer is that time has more aspects\/dimensions than the linear clock-time. I think there is a primorial beyond-time that still has time-llike qualities, in fact may be the REAL time from which clock-time somehow borrows its existence. Again, we’ll have to talk……..<\/p>\n
\nyes u are right – it is so easy to talk about time in linear terms – and even in trying to break that pattern I fell into it. So “in the begining there was just one sound” is an incorect statement by the word”begining”.. There is no begining and no end” And actually no middle either. Every event (contradiction) exists in eternty – so that theoretically the nothingness still exists. Let me think about this.
\nPiet<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
but we have to go deeply into the question of what BEFORE means if time started with the big bang. I think the answer is that time has more aspects\/dimensions than the linear clock-time. I think there is a primorial beyond-time that still has time-llike qualities, in fact may be the REAL time from which […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[36],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-870","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-astrophysicist"],"yoast_head":"\n